It is my opinion, and I must admit Im far from an expert in the matter, that the VAT, taxing text messages and similar measures is a more equitable way of taxing the general population that is very resistant to taxation than flat out income taxes for everyone. It should benefit the working class, the ones who need it the most. Currently, under the income tax system of taxation, it is the employees, including the minimum wage earners, who carry the heaviest burden of taxation. And it is very unfair to them. Essentially, this way, taxation is based on what a citizen can afford, which is based, automatically, on what he makes.
From my experience in business, it is my rough estimate, that 25% to 50% of Filipinos do not pay taxes at all or at least not their fair share of it. That is, the professionals (attorneys, doctors,) who can easily manipulate their declared income and people who comprise the underground economy, who contrary to general perception and which I discovered to my surprise, many of whom actually earn equal to if not more than your minimum wage earners. It is very difficult to determine these peoples income, but they cannot hide their expenses from the VAT, text and like taxes. If this can be implemented properly and successfully, then the govt would have more than enough revenues for its needs and programs from the expanded taxpayer base, and can take a little less off the estimated additional taxes from the minimum wage earners, and eventually exempt them from paying taxes or have them pay only a minimal amount.
An income tax on the rich, of course, can be added on top of the other measures.
I think a person who can afford to be texting and texting that the possibility of a text tax is of concern to them, can afford a few centavos of tax. If they are truly poor, they would not even be having cell phones. The bigger problem really is more of an attitude one there. A little too much sense of entitlement, with no corresponding sense of responsibility.
Although politicians themselves are to blame for that as they accuse each other of all sort of atrocious stuff and behave like neanderthals. And having worked in high govt myself once, except for a few, I find that it is actually quite exaggerated. I actually found corruption worse on the lower tier of the bureaucracy. But I dont know if that is the general rule, or just my particular experience.
The government should really tax the Catholic church. Selling god is one of the most profitable enterprises in the country. Moreover, they keep interfering with government. It should be taxed!!
It is the rich and the upper middle class that will benefit from suspending the E-VAT on oil because they are the biggest users of oil productsnot the poor. The poor use their money, because they cannot help it, mainly to buy rice and agricultural food products that are VAT-exempt.
Tinkering with the E-VATwhich can only be done by passing a lawwill plunge the Philippines back into the dream world it lived in before.
The purpose of the law was and continues to be to gather as much money for government to use in launching and completing major infrastructure and socio-economic modernization programs. These would make the Philippine economy rise from stagnation, compete more ably with other developing and emerging economies and thereby make the Filipinos a more prosperous people. The VAT, which in simple terms is an overarching sales tax, was to become a major vehicle to finance government plans and programsincluding poverty-reduction, health-enhancement, educational-system improvement and infrastructure-construction programs. The VAT would also substantially reduce deficit-spending and its destructive chain of consequences on the economy.
It can be said with certainty that the achievement of the Arroyo administration to raise the countrys GDP growth rate in 2007 to a record 27-year-high of 7.2 percent was, to a large extent, owed to the E-VAT.
The government, having enough moneythanks partly to the E-VAT collection and the overseas Filipino workers contribution to it, in the first months of 2008, could immediately blunt the effect of suddenly very costly rice and essential commodities. The administration handed out P500 each to some poor families and, through the National Food Authority, sold imported rice at subsidized prices.
Tinkering with the E-VAT will threaten the completion of major infrastructure vital to industrial and tourism-related projects begun by foreign direct investors. Schoolhouses and hospitals that are being built to greatly elevate the level of basic education and health care in our most depressed areas will be left unfinished. Budgets for the support of scientists and their research work aimed to launch a dramatic rise in world-class technological achievement in Philippine universities will no longer be available. Poverty-reduction and livelihood-creation projects in slums will have to be dropped. More and sadder consequences would happen if the E-VAT is suspended.
And, as shown by our own and other countries experience, temporary measures once instituted tend to take root and become permanent.
This is an important topic. When I was planning to buy a property, I made sure that a professional advisor tells me about all income tax benefit on home loan. It is one thing that a person can consider because it will help a lot in future.
Hello. Thanks for the post. Since I`m a crypto trader it is very important for me. I can recommned you to invest in Solana coin. According to one solana price prediction, the price of SOL could reach a minimum of $174.43, while its maximum can reach $213.55 in 2025. A different source, Capital.com claims the price of SOL could climb to $421 by the end of 2025.